All Posts Tagged With: "a.r.s."
Hawk Radio (Nov. 2007): “The Edge: Larry Brennan” @ The Wog Blog
From: “R. Hill” < rhill@xenu-directory.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Hawk Radio (Nov. 2007): “The Edge: Larry Brennan” @ The Wog Blog
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:40:46 -080014 minutes 55 seconds in the audio recording:
«[…] It was a weekly demand in that time period in 82 where $40 million got funnelled. There was calls from Miscavige and his people every single week, “a million has got to go… half a million has got to go … work out whatever the significance is…”
«He has threatened to strangle people if they didn’t do it. […] I’ve seen him at the Church’s international headquarter, I’ve seen him take a top WDC member and punch him hard in the mouth, another strangled down to the floor, another one slapped down, because they wouldn’t listen to him and Hubbard. […]»http://xenutv.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/the-edge/
(do I have the transcription right for that part?)
Ray.
Daily Mail: “Cruise is consulted by Scientology leader David Miscavige…
From: “R. Hill” < rh...@xenu-directory.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Daily Mail: “Cruise is consulted by Scientology leader David
Miscavige on ‘every aspect of planning and policy’”
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:00:52 -0800 (PST)
[…]
“Cruise is consulted by Scientology leader David Miscavige on ‘every
aspect of planning and policy’”
Quite a lots of implication in that single statement. I have this
picture of an hypothetical scenario in David Miscavige, is in court to
account for the wrongs done do people in the name of Scientology, his
defense would be “Tom told me to do this!”.
The funny part is that Abelson denied with another statement that also
carries a lots of implications:
“He is a parishioner, a well respected parishioner, but that’s what he
is. The only person who runs the Church and makes policy decisions is
David Miscavige.”
Anyway, are the two statements inconsistent? Not really I think. Tom
Cruise is consulted, but David Miscavige makes the final decision,
after taking into account Tom Cruise’s ‘wisdom’.
Ray.
Daily Mail: “He didn’t ask to speak to David Miscavige and wrote some horrible things about him”
From: “R. Hill”
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Daily Mail: “He didn’t ask to speak to David Miscavige and wrote some horrible things about him”
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:42:04 -0800 (PST)
As read on the Daily Mail:
Elliot Abelson, general counsel for the Church of Scientology:
“He didn’t ask to speak to David Miscavige and wrote some horrible
things about him which are totally untrue. No one has ever made
complaints of that kind.”
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…
“No one”?
Actually there are reports out there that David Miscavige physically
assaulted staff. Larry Brennan made public statements supporting that
(2007):
“In that exact time period I have seen [David Miscavige] at the
churches International headquarters. I’ve seen him take a top WC
member, punch him hard on the mouth. Another one strangled down to the
floor. […]”
Source:
http://xenutv.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/the-edge/
And how about Don Larson’s statements (1998):
“David Miscavige comes up, grabs him by the tie and starts bashing him
into the filing cabinet. And he’s thrown out in the street; his tie is
ripped off. Um, this is just a warm-up kind of bash.”
Source:
http://video.google.com/…
And for someone who promotes the machine-gunning of psychiatrists,
these accounts of beating are not exactly out of this world.
Source:
http://cosmedia.freewinds.cx/…
Will there be more of these accounts in 2008? Time will tell.
Ray.
DM lies in sworn testimony
From: “SME” <larrybren12…@aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Want some fun? Read this about DM
Date: 11 Jan 2007 09:01:09 -0800I would like to quote two things about DM and see if anyone else thinks
this might be a little odd.OK, this first is from a declaration that David Miscavige made on 15
October 1999 in the case of Wollersheim vs. the Church of Scientology
of California. It is part 57 of that declaration.“57. Upon the dismantling of the GO, church executives within the
ecclesiastical hierarchy assumed responsibility for the legal
affairs which the GO had mishandled. This era was marked by great
concerns about the religion’s future in the aftermath of the GO,
and it was against this backdrop that newly assigned personnel
began to examine the legal affairs that had been the exclusive
province of the GO for 15 years. Not being experienced in such
matters, they retained legal counsel to review the structure of the
entire religion. I know the concern was not “gutting CSC” to ” avoid
Wollersheim,” or anybody else for that matter. The history that
Wollersheim ignores concerned events of far greater importance than
his case. In fact, at the time, I had never even heard of the man.
I was not involved in that restructuring, but I am aware of the
events that led up to it. I shortly thereafter resigned from church
staff for 5 years, as described later in this declaration”.While I quoted the whole section above, the main part I am referring to
is the next to the last sentence:“I was not involved in that restructuring, but I am aware of the
events that led up to it”.Soooooo, as we can see in DM’s own words, he was NOT involved in the
corporate restructuring, right?Now look at the following link from one of their own web pages about
DM:http://www.scientologytoday.org/corp/rtc2.htm
The sentence on that page I refer you to is:
“Mr. David Miscavige has worked tirelessly to protect the religion.
He authored the early 1980’s reorganization of Church corporate and
management structures which have given the religion years of sustained
growth and stable leadership”.Sooooooooooo, as we can see on the Church of Scientology’s own website
about DM, he not only WAS involved in the corporate restructuring but
“authored” it, right?Um…. errr…..does anyone else notice anything strange here?
Would you believe they were BOTH lies (as are a couple other statements
he made in just that part 57 of the declaration)??? LMAOI just thought some of you may enjoy this:)
BTW, can anyone help me to save this website page (quickly) so that it
can be shown as having existed if “the church” suddenly panics and
changes it? That would be helpful to a little project I am working on.SME
Introduction to L. Ron Hubbard’s Admissions
On 11 March 2000, Gerry Armstrong posted the text of the Admissions documents, along with an introduction to alt.religion.scientology The Introduction follows:
Making Light of Black PR, Part 7, The Admissions of L. Ron Hubbard.
This is my contribution to the celebrations and protests on the
occasion of the birthday of L. Ron Hubbard in 2000.Not all that long ago, someone sent me a copy of the set of writings
which follow, written by L. Ron Hubbard in or about 1947. The
original of these writings was in Hubbard’s personal archive which I
assembled and worked with in 1980 and 1981. I provided the writings
to Omar Garrison, a wog ® writer with whom $cientology had contracted
to write Hubbard’s “authorized biography.” In 1984 I read portions of
them into the record at my trial in $cientology v. Armstrong, Los
Angeles Superior Court, Case No. C 420153. The trial resulted in the
widely cited decision by Judge Paul G. Breckenridge, Jr. wherein he
described Hubbard as a “pathological liar.” (URL?)Omar first called these writings Hubbard’s “Affirmations.” Later,
after it dawned on him that Hubbard was a stupendous liar, Omar said
he was correcting himself, and thereafter called the writings the
“Admissions.” I believe that Omar was right, and that these writings
are “Affirmations,” but more importantly, “Admissions.”I will not now provide anything really of my own analysis or
conclusions about Hubbard’s Admissions, because I want every
$cientologist or wog ® who reads them to be free, or with negligible
influence, to think about them for himself. I will comment below, for
legal reasons, on *why* I am posting the Admissions. I have my own
experiences, naturally, with these writings, I have drawn my own
conclusions about them, and I expect I will participate in a
discussion or two they may generate.I don’t know who in this recent period sent me the copy from which I
typed that follows. In any event I would not divulge the identity of
the person because of the clear and senseless threat of attack from
the people who now run $cientology. It is sufficient for legal
purposes to state that the copy I received was not made by me. By the
time the Admissions are posted to the internet, I will have, pursuant
to the wishes of the person who made it, destroyed the copy I
received.I will also immediately wipe the Admissions from my hard drive. Thus
the people who run $cientology will have less reason or justification
to raid me or break into my house or computer than they have to raid
or break into the house or computer of a million other people.The Admissions I received are not complete. Perhaps when the kind
person who sent me the copy sees they have been posted he will send
the rest of the writings. My recollection is that the remainder of
the Admissions do not diverge from the substance, direction or tone of
what I’m posting here. Included in the remainder is, I think, a
deeper delve into Hubbard’s sexual anxieties or aberrations, following
the same vein he mined in the part I received. What I received, for
example, doesn’t include Hubbard’s startling admission, “It doesn’t
give me displeasure to hear of a virgin being raped. The lot of women
is to be fornicated.”I am posting the Admissions for all of the reasons stated in my
declaration of January 26, 1997, specifically in paragraphs 57 - 65,
which I recently posted to a.r.s.:From: armstr…@dowco.com (Gerry Armstrong)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Making Light of Black PR, Part 2, January 26, 1997 Armstrong
Declaration for RTC v. Ward.
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 08:12:59 GMT
Message-ID: <38c3687e.235039…@news.dowco.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
NNTP-Posting-Host: tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
X-Trace: 6 Mar 2000 00:14:19 -0800, tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
Lines: 1276
Path: news.vphos.net!tch1c192.chw.dowco.com
Xref: ares.vphos.net alt.religion.scientology:1212275In that declaration I provided my expert opinion that the exposing or
dissemination of $cientology’s “sacred scriptures,” which exposure or
dissemination the organization prohibits, suppresses and punishes by
commercial, secular copyright and trademark law and millions upon
millions of simoleons to lawyer scumbags, is justified by the greater
principle of religious freedom. I stated that publication of
$cientology’s “secret scriptures” is in my opinion Constitutionally
protected religious expression.Hubbard’s Admissions are quite obviously a part of $cientology’s
“scriptures. On the holiness scale ®, they are holier than the
holiest of the Advanced Technology scriptures, because the people who
run $cientology won’t show them to $cientologists even if they have a
half million dollars to pay and agree to the organization implant.
Although the Admissions are the holiest of $cientology’s scriptures,
the Miscavige regime withholds them for the identical commercial,
secular, base and criminal reasons they withhold the “OT” “Levels,”
the “NOT$,” and the whereabouts of Xenu’s mountain cave.$cientology has set no prerequisites or punishments that I’m aware of
for $cientologists reading Hubbard’s Admissions, and for that at least
I’m grateful. I believe that the Admissions should be read by every
$cientologist at whatever point they find themselves on the bridge.
$cientologists won’t get pneumonia. They might have some good
cognitions. ® They might become free.The Admissions were very important to me in my getting free of the web
of lies Hubbard and $cientology had spun, and getting free of their
domination and suppression. I am posting these writings now with the
prayer that they help to free other $cientologists from Hubbard’s and
Miscavige’s lies, domination and suppression. If Hubbard has been
humbled and regained his willfully lost humanity, I know he too would
want every $cientologist to read all his Admissions.Obviously I don’t have any desire to profit monetarily by posting
Hubbard’s unpublished Admissions. My desire is that these writings
help everyone, $cientologist and wog ®, to make informed and better
choices about L. Ron Hubbard and $cientology. I was not freed by
being a $cientologist, doing $cientology, and having all the
experiences, cognitions and trappings of $cientology. I was freed by
reading what $cientologists don’t get to read, by being what no
$cientologist would be, a wog ®, by doing what no $cientologist would
do, and having my own experiences, cognitions and stuff. I share
Hubbard’s Admissions with everyone because God Who created knowledge
does not want anyone to be kept ignorant.I stated in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration that the people $cientology
identified as violating the organization’s copyrights and sued - Grady
Ward, Lawrence Wollersheim, Keith Henson, Dennis Erlich, Arnie Lerma,
Bob Penny — were in general agreement that $cientology is not a
sincere, and hence real, religion, but is a criminal cult engaged in
harmful practices. I also stated that if these people are correct in
their assessment, and if they did expose or publish $cientology’s
“secret” documents, they were and are completely justified in having
done so.Repeating what I wrote in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration, “In my
opinion this kind of expression is an expected, logical response to
Scientology’s efforts to corrupt the meaning of religion in order to
“sanctify” its antisocial and dangerous mind set and criminal
activities. It is expression which cannot legally be prohibited or
punished by judicial process.” I agree completely that $cientology,
that is, $cientology as directed by David Miscavige and his regime, is
not a sincere, real religion, but a criminal cult engaged in harmful
practices.I could, quite clearly, have posted the Admissions anonymously. I
gave it serious consideration, because while I believe these writings,
for the peace and health and spirit of so many people, should be
posted immediately, I wanted to do what be effective and not the
stupid end of martyrdom. I decided against anonymity, however, for a
number of reasons. I believe that by U.$., Canadian and international
law, and common sense, I am permitted to publish these writings
openly. I believe that by common decency, by human and civil rights
codes, by being a Prophet to $cientologists (Pt$), and by God Himself,
I am urged, in fact directed, to post these writings and post them
openly.I am also posting the Admissions openly to confirm their authenticity.
The copy I received was not clear in places, and it is now gone. All
words, spellings, punctuation and notations are Hubbard’s, except for
brackets [] which are mine. I pray that DM makes the complete
original of the Admissions available for $cientologists around the
world. Indeed I pray that he reveals every hidden piece of Hubbard’s
writings, and yes, even his own secret documents, to all
$cientologists and interested wogs ®. Robert Vaughn Young and Stacy
Brooks at least have read the Admissions and will be able to confirm
that what follows here is, within reasonable parameters, authentic. I
was very careful, but if there are any errors at all in what I have
posted of the Hubbard Admissions, I urge DM to have them corrected.Posting the Admissions, I believe, lessens the threat of harm or
murder to silence me, but it ups the revenge factor ®. The person who
sent me the copy emphatically doesn’t want any trouble. Good Lord, I
don’t want any trouble, and I’m the guy who typed this copy and will
now post it using my own name to a.r.s. The person who sent the copy
certainly knew that I would recognize the writings and I’d like to
think wanted me to do with them what I’ve done and what the person was
in no position to do. I have not shown what I’m posting to anyone, but
I will now email it to certain people when I post it.I am aware that DM will almost certainly attack me. To justify his and
$cientology’s continuing attack, as Hubbard did for his continuing
attacks while he lived, they made attack their organizational policy
of choice, or scripture of choice I suppose I should say.
Nevertheless, perhaps this is a good time for Miscavige to learn that
non-attack is the best policy.I really think the $cientologists would be silly to sue me. Then
again I’ve thought they’re silly for years and years and that hasn’t
deterred them. But perhaps in this instance they can learn to not do
another silly thing. I’m giving $cientology and $cientologists
another golden opportunity to stop being silly. It’s God actually Who
gives everyone opportunities to stop being silly. I’m but a simple
messenger, with staggering inabilities, and at times admittedly silly.
Miscavige’s $cientology is willfully silly. Suppression is no
accident, it is willful. I am but a prophet who brings $cientologists
opportunities to be healed of their willfulness, silliness and
suppression.I am aware that the posting of the Admissions makes a godsent legal
test case. If I am guided by God, what I have done not being unsafe
or immoral, my post is protected expression because it cannot be
denied. Without including God, it is clear that $cientology,
$cientologists and their agents (for there are wogs ® who are
$cientology’s agents) are themselves responsible for my actions. What
they have done to silence me, to 8-C my body from place to place, to
invalidate me, to black PR me, to threaten me, to destroy me, has
either been a source of my state of mind, and hence my actions, or God
has. (I think it can be agreed that the mind directs actions, rather
than actions directing the mind.)If God is directing my actions, how could I do anything else? If DM
and his $cientology organization have affected my mind, they bear
responsibility for the act about which they might complain. In truth
both things are true. God is in control, and DM and $cientology have
unclean hands. It is observable throughout history that God sends
prophets, and even the unprophetable, to deal with tyrants and regimes
whose hands are unclean.A case can be made that my posting Hubbard’s Admissions is a fair and
appropriate response to DM’s dissemination and internet posting of my
writing known as the “pig dream.” Obviously I held the copyright to
that unpublished work. The pig dream was a glimpse in an extremely
literary form into the mind of Gerry Armstrong. The Admissions are a
glimpse in a different literary form into the mind of L. Ron Hubbard.I certainly don’t argue that Hubbard’s Admissions are no more
important or vital than my pig dream. There is, after all, nobody
paying huge sums of money and spending their lives working for
Armstrongology. On the other hand, Hubbard’s dead. DM had his agents
post the pig dream to hurt me. I’m posting Hubbard’s Admissions to set
$cientologists free. I’ll copyright my portion of this post, and
hereby give my permission for it to be copied and distributed.For fair use purposes, the context for the post containing
theAdmissions is the global controversy about Hubbard, about
$cientology’s antecedents, about Hubbard’s psyche, his honesty or
dishonesty, his mental technology, “Excalibur,” his promises, his
aims, his history, his theology, his hypnotism, his navy record, his
non-navy record, and other clearly controversial Hubbard-connected
conumdrums. The context is the controversy we see every day on a.r.s.
and in media around the world.The period when Hubbard made these Admissions involved John W.
Parsons, Sara Northrup, his family, magick, his “development” of
“Dianetics” leading to the publication of the book that would make him
famous and lead on to $cientology. Funnily, Hubbard and $cientology
claim that he was a “Special Officer” for the LAPD in this period and
that he was working for the U$ Navy to break up the Parsons “black
magic ring.” There is a VA record showing that around the time of the
Admissions Hubbard sought psychiatric help.Just one last thought, which I’ll repeat from my Jan 26, 1997
declaration, and which I pray that DM and his $cientologists take to
heart. Although man may attempt to keep God out of his other realms,
he surely cannot keep God out of religion, because in this world it is
His Realm. That’s sort of the message every prophet brings.I hope Hubbard’s Admissions are a blessing and a help to all.
© 2000 Gerry Armstrong
Go to The Admissions